SKU: 31511831679

1982-1992 Camaro Pro+ Brake System Rear 4302397R

Sale price$1417.47 Regular price$1574.97
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $393.74 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 19 - Jul 24

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

1982-1992 Camaro Pro+ Brake System Rear 4302397RFits 1982 92 GM F Body Cars w OE Saginaw 10 Bolt C clip (BIH) Disc Brake Housing Ends Features: 2 Piece, 6 Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum Powder Coated Finish Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc Plate Rotor w Billet Aluminum Hat Specs:

Fits 1982-92 GM F-Body Cars w/OE Saginaw 10 Bolt C-clip (BIH) Disc Brake Housing Ends


Features:

  • 2-Piece, 6-Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
  • CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum
  • Powder Coated Finish
  • Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
  • Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear
  • Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
  • 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat

Specs:

Applications GM F-Body 82-92
Axle Rear
Brand Baer Brakes
Caliper 6P
Caliper Color Red
Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Piston Quantity 6
Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Type Floating
Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number D0731
Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Construction Vented
Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Outside Diameter 14.000IN
Emission Code 6
Export Description Brake Components
Fitment Notes w/OE Saginaw 10 Bolt C-clip (BIH) Disc Brake Housing Ends
Grade Type Performance
Hose Material Stainless Steel
Includes Park Brake Yes
Includes Park Brake Cables Yes
Lug Count 5 Lug
Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) 18IN
Product Line 14 Inch Pro+
Product Type 14 Inch Pro+ Rear Brake Kit
Prop 65 (C, R or CR) CR
Prop 65 - Long Label WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov
Prop 65 - Short Label WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm. www.P65Warnings.ca.gov
Prop 65 Yes/No Yes
Rotor Thickness 1.150IN
Rotor Type 2-Piece
Surface Type Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated
System Notes Fits stock Saginaw 10 bolt C-clip rear end w/OE disc brakes
Template Q082P
Title Pro+ Brake System Rear
Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern 5x4.75

Application:

Year Make Model Submodel
1982-1992 Chevrolet Camaro
1982-1992 Pontiac Firebird
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 31511831679

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 14 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
R
Verified Purchase
RAFFAELE RUSSO
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent socks
Size: X-Large, Color: White
Awesome love them
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2026
R
Verified Purchase
Robert D Steffes
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
very comfortable
Size: Large, Color: White
very cushioning and good value. These are my favorite socks.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 13, 2025
C
Verified Purchase
Chris in Houston
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Finally, socks that fit and are comfortable
Size: X-Large, Color: White
I wear size 12.5 Wide shoes and have been through numerous "large" socks that shrink after the first wash and then are just too small. Local stores sell very few options in XL. Decided to give these a try and I'm glad I did. I like the height (just over the ankle joint) versus low cut or no-show, which tend to allow junk into the gaps. I like the material. It's thinner on top nd doesn't have compression areas. It's not overly thick, so if you are looking for cushion or extra support, look elsewhere. I have the same sock in a no-show in gray, but they are size L and are just a little too small, so I knew ahead what I was in for construction-wise. Those have been plenty durable, so it checks all the boxes. I'll be ordering some XLs in black and will keep on the lookout for gray.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2021
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Nice fit & holds shape
Size: Large, Color: White
Wear well. Hold up in use. Maintain a shape after multiple uses.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2025
T
Verified Purchase
techfan
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 4
Great socks / a bit expensive
Size: Large, Color: Black
These may be the Goldilocks of the socks I've tried. They have nearly the same quality as the MUCH pricier Darn Tough Vertex Ultralight Cushion Cool Max socks (also reviewed). They have better quality, and a higher price, than a similar pair of PUMA socks (also reviewed). Pros: Very well made, with no loose stitching, comfortable forefoot and heel cushioning, good ventilation via top mesh, good arch compression, minimal logos and mostly solid color. Cons: Price is a bit on the high side, but better than the Darn Tough socks. I could honestly have made a good case for any of these three (ASICS, PUMA, or Darn Tough), which explains their collective high ratings. I did the top 3 reviews first. When I get a chance, I'll go back and review the average and terrible :) If money is no object, get the Darn Tough Vertex. If you're price sensitive, and willing to compromise a bit on quality, go with the PUMAs, which is what I did. Otherwise, these ASICS are near the same quality as the Darn Tough, but less expensive. Tough decisions :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2017

recommand products